Advanced Workshop Evaluations 2009-2017

The evaluation forms were filled out anonymously by the participants at the end of each workshop

29 workshops: 270 participants & respondents from the University of Kent (136);  Kingston University in Moscow (64) and SOAS, University of London (70).

 

(1) very poor (2) poor (3) adequate (4) good (5) excellent

Presentation & Content 1    2    3    4    5    (4+5)
Instructor's knowledge of the subject 0 0 0 30
240
(100%)
Instructor's method of teaching 0 1
2
67
200 (99%)
Instructor answering questions 0 0 8
60
202 (97%)
Your assessment of the theoretical content?    0 0 24
96
150 (91%)
Your assessment of the role plays? 0 2
10
58 200 (96%)

 

(1) very poor (2) poor (3) adequate (4) good (5) excellent

Role Play Exercise  1   2   3   4   5   (4+5) 
The Crocodile Story  (41 NA)  

2  
30 
89 
107 
(86%) 

The Mouse Exercise  (37 NA)

The Mercury Negotiation (235 NA)

0

0

2

0

2

1

45

7

184

27

(98%)

(97%)

 

(1) strongly disagree (2) disagree (3) neutral (4) agree (5) strongly agree

Future Planning   

3
4
5
(4+5) 
I would recommend this workshop to another student   0 0 2
59
209 (99%)
What I learned will help me in my personal life 0 1
20
75
174
(92%)

The PNBR template is a useful tool in preparing for a negotiation (57 NA)

0

 

2

 

18

 

55

 

138

 

(91%)